MECEP Action Tax Fairness Scorecard — 131st Maine Legislature

WELCOME

“For legislators to be held accountable for their actions, a clear display of their votes must be accessible to their constituents. This scorecard focuses on Tax Fairness because while tallies like this exist for many topics, there is no definitive scorecard in Maine with only this lens. Tax policy undergirds all we aspire to do. We cannot make progress on housing, health care, education, child care, transportation, and more if we are unwilling to raise the resources needed in a fair and adequate manner. We present this first-of-its-kind record to show Mainers whether their elected officials are making choices that move us in the direction of a well-funded, fair, and prosperous state or one of scarcity and inequality.”  

Garrett Martin, President and CEO of MECEP Action

OVERVIEW

Taxes are essential for everyone. They fund important things like schools, clean air and water, and safe roads. Businesses rely on these too, along with a healthy and educated workforce, modern infrastructure, and affordable energy.

In Maine, we understand that taxes help create strong communities, support jobs, and build a thriving economy. Fair taxes are a key part of a just society — and Tax Fairness is crucial for a democracy that works for everyone.

Tax Fairness:
  1. Fair contribution: Everyone pays their fair share based on what they can afford. Those with less pay less, and those with more pay more.
  2. No cheating: No one can rig the rules to avoid paying their fair share.
  3. Strong communities: Every city, town, and community in Maine can offer quality services and infrastructure.
  4. Fair competition: Small, local businesses can compete equally with large corporations.
Tax UN-Fairness:
  1. Burden on families with low income: Families with lower incomes end up paying a larger share of their income in taxes, while wealthy families pay less.
  2. Corporate loopholes: Wealthy corporations exploit tax loopholes, meaning less money for our communities and everyday Mainers picking up the tab.
  3. Funding big business: Mainers’ tax dollars often fund billion-dollar corporations through tax breaks and payments, even when these giveaways don’t deliver the promised benefits.
  4. Lack of transparency: Mainers have no way to know how much large corporations are contributing to our state through taxes or benefiting from tax breaks.

Don’t know who your legislators are? Find them here.

BILLS CONSIDERED

Sponsored by: Rep. Melanie Sachs (D-Freeport) 
Our position: Support 
House Roll Call: #350
Senate Roll Call: #484
 
Result: Passed by the Legislature and signed by the Governor 

Building off a continuing services budget passed in March 2023 that funded baseline services for Maine communities, the “part two budget” provided historic supports — establishing a paid family and medical leave program for Maine, committing over $100 million in housing affordability and emergency shelter, and supporting child care workers and increasing supports for parents to better afford child care. On the Tax Fairness front this bill overhauled the property tax programs for older Mainers to make sure money is reaching people who need help most and gave access to Maine’s child tax credit for parents with the lowest income by making the Dependent Exemption Tax Credit refundable. 

“This is what good economic development looks like — investments that bet on people and help us all thrive.” — Maine Center for Economic Policy commentary 

*A Yea vote on these roll calls is the correct Tax Fairness vote in both chambers 

Sponsored by: Rep. Jack Ducharme (R-Madison) 
Our position: Oppose 
Senate Roll Call: #450 
Result: Defeated in both chambers

Touted to reduce income taxes for Mainers with low income, this bill would have given the greatest benefit to Mainers who already have the greatest income and would not have reduced taxes for Mainers with low income in any meaningful way. It also would have reduced resources available to invest in Maine people and communities by over $200 million per year. Under this proposal Mainers making over $150,000 would have gained the most, with those making under $25,000 receiving little to no benefit. That’s because Maine’s high standard deduction and personal exemption mean that many Mainers with low incomes already pay little or no taxes while Mainers with higher incomes are able to shield more of their income from taxation through itemized deductions and would ultimately be the primary beneficiaries of any reduction in taxes at lower income brackets without a corresponding increase in upper brackets. 

“Delivering real, targeted tax cuts to low- and middle-income households requires refundable credits, not rate changes. There are better targeted ways to help Mainers who need it most than this proposal, including other proposals … that have bipartisan support, like expanding the Dependent Exemption Tax Credit.” — Maine Center for Economic Policy commentary 

*A Yea vote on this roll call to accept the Ought Not to Pass Report is the correct Tax Fairness vote

Sponsored by: Rep. Ben Collings (D-Portland) 
Our position: Support 
House Roll Call: #301 
Result: Passed in the House and defeated in the Senate 

Sixty percent of household wealth in the United States is obtained through inheritance rather than direct labor. The estate tax — paid only by the very wealthiest — is a critical tool for reducing inequality and investing in the things that create shared prosperity. But in the last decade, Maine’s estate tax has been hollowed out, delivering a massive tax break to the ultra-wealthy. A more robust estate tax would improve economic opportunity and help fund needed investment in Maine communities. Lowering the exclusion amount will make the state economy fairer and better able to meet the housing needs of Mainers. 

“Conversations about the estate tax inevitably turn to questions about who pays. The reality is that most Mainers are lucky to earn $2 million dollars over an entire lifetime, let alone to have million-dollar estates to pass on to heirs. Inequality grows when our tax system is tilted in favor of the wealthiest, as it was when lawmakers cut Maine’s estate tax.” — Maine Center for Economic Policy commentary 

*A Yea vote on this roll call is the correct Tax Fairness vote 

Sponsored by: Rep. Meldon Carmichael (R-Greenbush) 
Our position: Support 
House Roll Call: #469
Senate Roll Call: #680
 
Result: Passed by the Legislature, vetoed by the Governor 

A bipartisan proposal came out of the Taxation Committee to create a new top tax bracket of 8.45% on taxable income over $500,000, with a corresponding expansion of the bottom bracket to make the bill revenue neutral. Bipartisan support for raising taxes on people with wealth is a huge step forward for Maine, showing legislators in both parties recognize many Mainers are struggling and making our tax system fairer will help address this problem. 

“When multimillionaires pay the same income tax rate as a Mainer making just $62,000 a year, it should be obvious that change is needed. It’s no secret that Maine has significant needs that require significant investment. Instead of saying what we can’t afford to do in every budget cycle, let’s ask more of those who can afford it, and build a vibrant economy that works for all Mainers.” — Maine Center for Economic Policy commentary 

*A Yea vote on these roll calls is the correct Tax Fairness vote in both chambers 

Sponsored by: Rep. Ann Matlack (D-Spruce Head) 
Our position: Support 
House Roll Call: #439
Senate Roll Call: #642
 
Result: Passed by the Legislature and allowed into law without signature by the Governor 

Corporations rely on our tax dollars to pay for things they use — our roads, ports, and educated workforce — to make their profits. It’s only fair that they pay what they owe into the system, the same as hardworking Mainers and small businesses. But corporations often deploy complicated tax loopholes and accounting schemes to avoid paying what they owe, which shifts costs on to Maine taxpayers. Maine’s new corporate tax transparency law will allow lawmakers and the public to see — for the first time — how many of the biggest corporations doing business in Maine are paying $0 in taxes. This information will help the legislature determine if big corporations in Maine are paying their fair share in taxes, and if not, help hold them accountable. 

“Shareholders can gauge the financial health of a company before they invest in it, but the same opportunity is not afforded to Maine taxpayers who subsidize businesses with their tax dollars.” — Maine Center for Economic Policy commentary 

*A Yea vote on these roll calls is the correct Tax Fairness vote in both chambers 

Sponsored by: Sen. Troy Jackson (D-Aroostook) 
Our position: Oppose
House Roll Call: #536
Senate Roll Call: #782
 
Result: Passed by the Legislature and signed by the Governor 

A $2 million refundable tax break for the Sea Dogs over 15 years was approved by the Legislature and signed by the Governor despite a mountain of evidence showing it is a bad investment. The funds will go to Diamond Baseball Holdings (DBH), one of the biggest owners of minor league baseball teams in the US, a subsidiary of Silver Lake investment, one of the top private equity firms in the world. DBH argued it couldn’t afford the repairs to Hadlock Stadium required by Major League Baseball, some of which have already been made. Now Maine taxpayers will foot the bill instead. 

“With so many other unmet needs in our state, there are more important priorities than subsidizing a renovation of a sports stadium. Research shows that subsidies for sports stadiums are not a sound investment of taxpayer dollars. Ultimately those who will benefit most from this subsidy are the investors of the private equity firm that owns the Sea Dogs.” — Maine Center for Economic Policy commentary 

* A Nay vote on these roll calls is the correct Tax Fairness vote in both chambers 

TAX FAIRNESS CHAMPIONS

These legislators were present and voted for Tax Fairness 100% of the time throughout their service in the 131st Legislature.

In the Senate:

Senator Nicole Grohoski, District 7

Senator Mike Tipping, District 8 

Senator Cameron Reny, District 13 

Senator Stacy Brenner, District 30 

In the House of Representatives:

Representative Lynne Williams, District 14 

Representative Nina Milliken, District 16 

Representative Ambureen Rana, District 21 

Representative Laura Supica, District 22 

Representative Amy Roeder, District 23 

Representative Laurie Osher, District 25 

Representative Valli Geiger, District 42 

Representative William Pluecker, District 44 

Representative David Sinclair, District 50 

Representative Cheryl Golek, District 99 

Representative Daniel Ankeles, District 100 

Representative Poppy Arford, District 101 

Representative Melanie Sachs, District 102 

Representative Grayson Lookner, District 113 

Representative Samuel Zager, District 116

Representative Deqa Dhalac, District 120 

Representative Christopher Kessler, District 121 

Representative Sophia Warren, District 124 

Representative Andrew Gattine, District 126 

Representative Suzanne Salisbury, District 128 

Representative Margaret O’Neil, District 129 

Representative Lori Gramlich, District 131 

Representative Erin Sheehan, District 132 

Representative Kristi Mathieson, District 151

GOVERNOR MILLS

Governor Mills’ performance on Tax Fairness issues over the past two years has been mixed. For the bills above, the Governor contributed to Tax Fairness in three out of six instances. These are the results: 

  • On the budget (LD 258) Governor Mills signed the bill into law 
  • On the empty promise for low-income Mainers (LD 1671) the Governor’s administration testified against the bill 
  • On fighting inequality and raising revenue (LD 1338) the Governor’s administration testified against the bill 
  • On creating a new top bracket (LD 1231) Governor Mills vetoed the bill after it successfully passed the House and Senate
  • On shining a light on corporate tax avoidance (LD 1337) Governor Mills allowed the bill to become law without her signature 
  • On the new subsidy for a private equity firm (LD 2258) Governor Mills signed the bill into law 

However, a governor’s influence on state policy extends well beyond their interaction with the Legislature on these bills. Governor Mills stood against several poorly planned tax cuts that would have gutted funding for education and health care, but also against progressive revenue sources that would balance our tax system and allow for more investments in our communities, including actively opposing a millionaire surcharge. The Governor also supported bills that boosted credits targeted toward Mainers with low income, but simultaneously supported new corporate giveaways, including the massive new Dirigo business subsidies that will cost the state over $50 million annually in the years to come.

This lost revenue and rejection of progressive changes to our tax code led to an artificially tight budget when the Legislature considered the many unmet needs in our state including housing, direct care worker shortages, the public servant pay gap, and rising educational costs. The Governor can and must be bolder when it comes to Tax Fairness if we hope to meet these unmet needs in the future and build an economy where all Mainers can thrive. 

METHODOLOGY

A scorecard’s goal should be to show a clear and fair accounting of how each individual legislator’s voting record aligns with a particular stance or ideal. This task is complicated by a number of factors, including lack of roll calls in either or both chambers, multiple roll calls on a single bill with differing levels of attendance and outcomes, and the question of whether absences should be counted against a legislator or simply left out of the calculation of their score.  

In this first MECEP Action Tax Fairness Scorecard our staff collected the bills with roll calls that best tested this specific issue. We included one bill (LD 1338) that only had a roll call in the House and another (LD 1671) that only had a roll call in the Senate. The votes above reflect the final roll call taken in each chamber for each bill except for LD 1231, where the presented roll call precedes the final vote in each chamber. This decision was made because the increased attendance for these votes in both chambers offered more data and a better picture of how more individual legislators chose to act on this bill. However, in the interest of showing a more complete picture, we have added an asterisk next to the votes of the 14 House members who changed their vote between this initial roll call and the final vote of the chamber, which was the vote to reconsider the Governor’s veto of the bill. 

Because of the complications inherent in trying to assess the reasons for absences, we are offering the voting records above without a final “score” or tabulation excusing or penalizing a lack of a vote. Any Mainer can see how their legislator voted on each bill and in the case of an absence reach out to their elected official for an explanation. We have also chosen to highlight the four Senators and 24 Representatives who were present and voted for Tax Fairness as indicated by the bills presented in this scorecard as Tax Fairness Champions.